Bacterial ghost: Future vaccine candidate for Aquaculture
B.T. Naveen Kumar1, Babin Boppanna. K1,
Omkar V Byadgi1 , Mansoor ahmad1, Prabhugouda
Shiriyappagouder1, Pradeep L. doddamani2, Kamalesh panda2,
Adil. B1.
1 Deparment of Aquaculture, 2 Department
of Fisheries Management, College of Fisheries, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and
Fisheries Sciences University.
Corresponding author: naveenkumar504@gmail.com
Keywords: Bacteria
Ghost, Vaccine, Delivery vehicles, Fish immune system.
Rapid strides in aquaculture practices are achieved by
geographical expansion and technological advancements in reproduction in
captivity, larval rearing, formulated artificial diet and intensification in
grow out systems. This intensification practice has given very good profit to
the farmers and it led to intensification of larval rearing system with more
technological advancement. These practices were reported to cause disease
problems in the culture systems.
Disease control by the antibiotics in culture
practices had reported to show improvement but residues of drugs in animal
tissue, antibiotic resistance and transfer of antibiotic resistance gene has
banned the farmers to use it (FAD). To overcome this problem, Vaccination was
judged to be the best method.
The main purpose of vaccination is to enhance the
immune system of an animal and recognize pathogenic agent to reduce the
severity of a disease. This disease reduction or control in an animal is based
on the recognition or interaction of immunoglobulin to vaccine agent (Inactive
pathogen). Hence, involvement of specific immune system is major concern in the
vaccination process.
Vaccination
is done in three different methods
1.
Injection
2.
Immersion
3.
Oral vaccination
Among
these, oral vaccination is the better method because of its effectiveness and
low cost. Oral vaccination technique like; killed pathogen, bacterial ghost,
subunit, attenuated vaccine are in use at present. Among which, heat killed and
attenuated vaccine often results altering the antigenic site or epitope (7).
Though, the use of subunit vaccine is projected as substitute for the heat
killed and attenuated vaccine and can be easily produced by expression of gene
of interest in a host cell but its use in aquaculture is less it is mainly due
to its poor immunogenic property and animals are not exposure to natural state
of pathogenic part Hence, new approaches or methods should be developed to
improve the vaccination in fish. The bacterial ghost system is one such
vaccine.
What
do you mean by Bacterial ghost (BGs)?
Bacterial ghost are mainly derived from gram negative
bacteria (1). They are devoid of all cytoplasmic content but have a preserved
cellular morphology including all cell surface structure. These are empty, non
living envelope and retain surface antigenic protein structures in a natural
state.

Fig.1: Bacterial ghost
Source:
http://2008.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Results/Engineered_flagellin_vaccine/Engineered_bacterial_vaccine
Appearance
of BGs: (Fig.1)
Ghost can be distinguished from their living unlysed
cells using light microscopic examination by their: slight elongated appearance
and transparent cells than living bacterial cell. It is provided with a tunnel
(Hole- 40-200nm) at center or poles to expel the inner contents (Fig 2)
(1).

Fig.
2; High resolution field emission
scanning electron micrograph of protein E-lysed Gram-negative bacteria. An
arrow indicates the efflux of bacterial cytoplasm at the time point of lysis
onset through the E-specific lysis tunnel.
Source:
Ebensen et al., 2004 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/172/11/6858.full.html#ref-list-1
Properties
of BGs:
BGs are free from the Cytoplasmic content and
bacterial DNA and they are non living bacteria. The production process of BG
does not denature the envelop part. Hence, all the antigenic determinants are
preserved during production process of BG. In addition, this provides intrinsic
adjuvant property to the animal and delivery system for drugs and DNA vaccine
etc.
Production
of BGs:
Bacterial ghost can be produced by expression of *gene
E (bacteriophage phiX174) in a target cell (gram negative bacteria). It results
in the lysis (Diameter 40-200nm) of bacterial cell. Where, this E- mediated
lysis helps the bacterial to release all its cytoplasmic contents to the environment, due to osmotic
pressure difference between the cytoplasm and the surrounding medium (Fig. 2).
Therefore, native structure of envelop remains intact and rigid. Thus,
bacterial ghost is formed.
*Gene E
●
Gene E codes for a 91 aa polypeptide (1).
●
Gene E having a hydrophobic region at N terminal and
end suggesting contranslational integration into the cytoplasmic membrane of
bacterial (Gram negative bacteria) (1, 2).
●
Gene E expression and lysis of depends on the growth of
the bacteria (gram negative bacteria) and its autolytic system (1).
Advantages:
●
BGs are not genetically
modified organisms
●
Lyophilized BGs can be
stored at ambient temperature
●
BGs are self adjuvant
●
There is no pathogenic
threat to the animal
●
It can be produced
easily by fermentation with bulk quantity
●
This is safe to use as
vaccine candidate and delivery system
●
It is having a less cost
of production
●
Delivery vehicle
for DNA vaccine (5)
●
Good recognition and
uptake by antigen-presenting cells
●
BGs as micro-bioreactors
for enzymatic reactions (1)
Application:
BGs
as a vaccine:
BG of Edwardsiella tarda admistration to olive flounder (Paralichthys
olivaceus) has found to be effective
in preventing or protecting the fish from edwardsiellosis. The admistarion of
BG via oral, immunization and immersion are effective in reducing the diseases
in fish. In aquaculture practice, oral vaccine works better. Therefore, BG is
the best vaccine for oral administration in aquaculture, due to its non living
nature, stability, low cost of production, long shelf life. (9, 12)
BGs
as adjuvant:
BGs production process does not denature the bacterial
envelop or surface protein and preserve pathogen- associated molecular patterns
(PAMPs) (1). These PAMPs induces the generation of cellular and humoral
response in an experimental animal (3).
BGs as antigen delivery vehicles:
The fusion of antigen to BGs through recombinant
technology helps in delivery of antigen to target system (4). This fusion of
antigen to membrane (BGs) did not affect the proper folding of enzymes. Hence,
the Bacterial ghost is a novel vaccine delivery system and it provides
excellent natural intrinsic adjuvant properties with versatile carrier
functions for foreign antigens (6).
Conclusion:
Bacterial ghost is a novel vaccine candidate and a
delivery system. It also provides natural adjuvant property, easy
manufacturing, low production costs, and excellent safety profile. Hence, it is
a promising technology for the development of more efficient vaccine in
aquaculture practices.
References:
1.
Langemann T, Verena
Juliana Koller, Abbas Muhammad, Pavol Kudela, Ulrike Beate Mayr and Werner
Lubitz. The bacterial ghost platform system: Production and applications. Bioengineered Bugs September/October 2010; 1:5, 326-336.
2.
Witte A, Lubitz W.
Biochemical characterization of phiX174-protein-E-mediated lysis of Escherichia
coli. Eur J Biochem 1989; 180:393-8.
3.
Riedmann EM, Kyd JM,
Cripps AW, Lubitz W. Bacterial ghosts as adjuvant particles. Expert Rev
Vaccines 2007; 6:241-53.
4.
Paukner S, Kohl G,
Lubitz W. Bacterial ghosts as novel advanced drug delivery systems: antiproliferative
activ ity of loaded doxorubicin in human Caco-2 cells. J Control Release 2004; 94:63-74.
5.
Ebensen T, Susanne
Paukner, Claudia Link, Pavol Kudela, Carola de Domenico, Werner Lubitz, and
Carlos A. Guzma«n. Bacterial Ghosts Are an Efficient Delivery System for DNA
Vaccines. J Immunol 2004;172;6858-6865.
6.
Mayr UB, Petra Walcher,
Chakameh Azimpour, Eva Riedmann, Christoph Haller, Werner Lubitz. Bacterial
ghosts as antigen delivery vehicles. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2005; 57; 1381Ð 1391.
7.
Szostak MP. Andreas Hensel, Francis O. Eko,
Reinhard Klein, Tatjana Auer, Horst Mader, Alexander Haslberger, Sebastian
Bunka, Gerhard Wanner, Werner Lubitz. Bacterial ghosts: non-living candidate
vaccines. Journal of Biotechnology
1996; 44; 161- 170.
8.
Se Ryaun Kwon, Yoon Kwon
Nam, Sung Koo Kim, Ki Hong Kim. Protection of tilapia (oreochromis
mosambicus) from edwardsiellosis by
vaccination with Edwardsiella tarda
ghosts. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol.2006;
20: 621-626.
9.
Se Ryaun Kwon, Eun Hye
Lee, Yoon Kwon Nam, Sung Koo Kim, Ki Hong Kim. Efficacy of oral immunization
with Edwardsiella tarda ghost
against edwardsiellosis in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquaculture. 2007; 269: 84-88.
10.
Se Ryun Kwon, Yue Jai Kang, Dong Jin Lee, Eun Hye Lee, Yoon Kwon Nam, Sung Koo Kim, Ki
Hong Kim. Generation of Vibrio anguillarum Ghost by Coexpression of PhiX 174 Lysis E gene and Staphylococcal Nuclease A Gene. Mo.
Biotechnol. 2009; 42: 154-159.
11.
Ra, Chae-Hun, Yeong-Jin Kim,
So-Jin Park, Chang-Wha Jeong, Yoon-Kwon Nam, Ki-Hong Kim, and Sung-Koo Kim.
Evaluation of Optimal Culture Conditions for Recombinant Ghost Bacteria Vaccine
Production with the Antigen of Streptococcus iniae GAPDH. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009; 19 (9): 982-986.
12.
Tu F.P., Chu W.H.,
Zhuang X.Y. and Lu C.P. Effect of oral immunization with Aeromonas
hydrophilla ghosts on protection
aganist experimental fish infection. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2010; 50: 13-17.
|
S.
N
|
Title
|
Outcome
|
Author
|
Journal
|
year
|
|
1
|
Protection of tilapia (oreochromis
mosambicus) from edwardsiellosis by
vaccination with Edwardsiella tarda
ghosts (ETG)
|
Fish immunized with ETG were
found to be effective in controlling the fish from edwardsiellosis.
|
Se Ryaun Kwon, Yoon Kwon
Nam, Sung Koo Kim, Ki Hong Kim
|
Fish and Shellfish
Immunology
|
2006
|
|
2
|
Efficacy of oral immunization
with Edwardsiella tarda ghost against edwardsiellosis in olive flounder
(Paralichthys olivaceus)
|
ETG are reported to elicit
immune response and protected the fishes from edwardsiellosis
|
Se Ryaun Kwon, Eun Hye Lee,
Yoon Kwon Nam, Sung Koo Kim, Ki Hong Kim
|
Aquaculture
|
2007
|
|
3
|
Generation of Vibrio
anguillarum Ghost by Coexpression of PhiX 174 Lysis E gene and Staphylococcal
Nuclease A Gene
|
Developed a safety-enhanced
Vibrio anguillarum ghost and it
can be used as a vaccine in aquaculture.
|
Se Ryun Kwon, Yue Jai Kang, Dong Jin Lee, Eun Hye Lee, Yoon Kwon
Nam, Sung Koo Kim, Ki Hong Kim
|
Molecular Biotechnology
|
2009
|
|
4
|
Evaluation of Optimal
Culture Conditions for Recombinant Ghost Bacteria Vaccine Production with the
Antigen of Streptococcus iniae
GAPDH
|
It showed higher survival
rate and good antibodies titre than formalin killed cell vaccine.
|
Ra, Chae-Hun, Yeong-Jin
Kim, So-Jin Park, Chang-Wha Jeong, Yoon-Kwon Nam, Ki-Hong Kim, and Sung-Koo
Kim.
|
Journal of Microbiology and
Biotechnology
|
2009
|
|
5
|
Effect of oral immunization
with Aeromonas hydrophilla ghosts
on protection aganist experimental fish infection
|
Higher protection to Aeromonas
hydrophilla infection in Carasius
arraus gibilla by increased antibody
titre.
|
F.P. Tu, W.H. Chu, X.Y.
Zhuang and C.P. Lu
|
Letters in Applied
Microbiology
|
2010
|
TABLE: STUDIES CARRIED OUT IN FISHERIES