|
BIOLOGICAL
PRODUCTIVITY OF WATER BODIES
Jitendra
Kumar1*,
Ramesh Kumar Tripathi3,
Neeraj Pathak2,
Archit Shukla4,
Saurabh Dubey1
1 College
of Fisheries, Mangalore, 2
College
of Fisheries, Veraval, 3Central
Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 4
College of Fisheries, Ludhiana,
Punjab
Introduction
Biological
productivity as an index of water quality and production potential of
cultured organism needs prime consideration for site selection.
Productivity in terms of qualitative and quantitative aspects of
plankton and benthos are treated separately, in this manual. In the
present discussion we shall look first at primary production and then
show this influences secondary production in water bodies. We shall
explain first certain concepts to elucidate aspects of productivity
and then the energy flow in an ecosystem and the importance of this
information in aquaculture. Finally we shall briefly refer to the
methods of measuring productivity.
Before we enter into
a discussion on productivity, it would be helpful to look at the
concepts of the ecosystem, habitat and ecological niche, and food
cycle in water bodies, including food chain and trophic structure.
These terms are of specific interest to aquaculture and productivity
in general and therefore deserve some consideration.
Ecosystem
The environment in
which the man and other organisms live is called the biosphere. The
biosphere is made up of different regions that have different types
of flora (plants) and fauna (animals). The types of organisms in an
area are determined by various factors such as the climate,
temperature, rainfall, etc.
An ecosystem is a
complete community of living organisms and the non-living materials
of their surroundings. Thus, its components include plants, animals,
and microorganisms; soil, rocks, and minerals; as well as surrounding
water sources and the local atmosphere. The size of ecosystems varies
tremendously. An ecosystem could be an entire rain forest, covering a
geographical area larger than many nations, or it could be a puddle
or a backyard garden. Even the body of an animal could be considered
an ecosystem, since it is home to numerous microorganisms.

The organisms, in
addition to being dependent on the environment for their needs, are
also dependent on each other. This dependency is especially for food.
This results in the presence of food chains and food webs.
|
ABIOTIC
COMPONENTS
|
BIOTIC
COMPONENTS
|
|
Sunlight
|
Primary
producers
|
|
Temperature
|
Herbivores
|
|
Precipitation
|
Carnivores
|
|
Water
or moisture
|
Omnivores
|
|
Soil
or water chemistry (e.g., P, NH4+)
|
Detritivores
|
|
etc.
|
etc.
|
Habitat and
ecological niche
The habitat of an
organism is "the place where it lives", whereas the ecological
niche, a term coined by Elton in 1927, can br termed as "the
position or status of an organism within its community and ecosystem
resulting from the organism's structural and functional adaptations".
By analogy, it is often said that habitat is the organism's "address"
and the niche is its "profession".
The concept of
ecological niche is of much interest to the aquaculturist, for it is
around it that the practice of "polyculture" of fishes is
centered. The well known examples are the polyculture of Chinese and
Indian carps including in some cases a predator species also. Here it
is basically the complete exploitation of the feeding niches in the
water body as exemplified by the mixing of surface feeders, some
depending predominantly on phytoplankton (silver carp), some on
zooplankton (Catla), column feeders (rohu), bottom
feeders (common carp and mrigal), feeders of aquatic (grass
carp) and predators (snakeheads). While the practice of
polyculture of fish in Asia is old and based mainly on empirical
information, it is necessary to critically examine this practice and
adapt or improve the presently practiced systems. In Africa
polyculture of compatible species of tilapias in combination with
predator fishes (Clarias gariepinus/ Ophiocephalus obscurus,
for e.g.) have been practiced in some countries. We shall be looking
into these aspects more closely, in the section on "Pond Culture",
in the present series.
Food cycle in
water bodies
The transfer of food
energy from the plants through a series of organisms is referred to
as the "food chain". Since it is not a single chain, but often
interlinking of energy transfer through several chains as a net or
web, the food chain should be more precisely referred to as food web.
At each transfer a large proportion of the potential energy in the
food is lost as heat. The number of steps or links in the transfer
sequence is usually limited to 4 or 5. The shorter the food
chain (or the nearer the organism to the original food
source) the greater the availability of energy which can be
converted into "biomass". For this reason aquaculturists can
produce fish more efficiently if they culture herbivorous fish.
Three types of food
chains are often recognized in water bodies as on land (i) the
predator chain start from a plant base through small animals to
larger animals; (ii) the parasite chain, from larger to smaller
organisms and (iii) the saprophytic chain, from dead matter into
micro-organisms.

Weight Relationship
of Components of Biota and Dissolved Organic Matter in a Lake
(After Welsh, 1957)
Concept of
productivity
The biological
productivity of aquatic systems, as of land, has been at several
levels, the basic or primary productivity which is again divisible
into gross and net primary productivity,
and secondary productivities at the various trophic levels
(discussion preceding). Basic or primary productivity is defined
as the rate at which energy is stored by photosynthetic activity of
producer organisms (chlorophyll bearing organisms, mainly plants and
phytoplankton) in the form of organic substances which can be used as
food substances.
Gross primary
productivity is the total rate of photosynthesis including
organic matter used up in respiration during the measurement period
(also known as total photosynthesis or total assimilation).
Net primary productivity is the rate of storage of energy
as food matter i.e. excluding the energy dissipated as respiration by
plants (also referred to as "apparent" photosynthesis or net
assimilation). Usually a value obtained for the rate of respiration
of plants is added to apparent photosynthesis to obtain estimates of
gross primary productivity.
The rates of energy
storage at trophic levels of consumers and decomposers are referred
to as "secondary productivities"; these rates as already
indicated are less and less at each succeeding trophic level. To be
correct, at secondary productivity level, there is only 'assimilation
of food already produced by the autotrophs (plants) at each
succeeding trophic levels (heterotrophs) and as such the term
'productivity' should not be associated with these trophic
levels.
The term
"productivity" is always used in this context to mean 'rate of
production' or 'rate of energy flow'. Gross production (PG)
and net production (PN)
are secondary productivities (P2 -
P5)
are indicated in the figure (energy flow).
Primary
production in fish ponds
Several studies have
been made in estimating the primary productivity of fish ponds. One
of the more important studies in this respect is that of Hepher
(1962) who compared the primary production in ponds; at different
levels of fertilization. Hepher obtained rates of primary production
at different depths in the fish pond. The results obtained by him are
included in Fig.10.4. Hepher found that a very high initial
fertilization did not result in high primary productivity, but medium
level of fertilization, where addition of fertilizers to pond was
done every two weeks in smaller quantities were more effective. The
productivity depth curves for standard level of fertilization (60 kg
superphosphate + 70 kg ammonium sulphate per ha every two weeks) and
double this level indicate this (Fig.10.4). Even though the double
fertilization resulted in higher gross production at the surface
total production, considering the whole depth of the pond was higher
in pond fertilized with standard fertilization. This has important
bearing for fertilization regimes in fish pond. These tests have to
be done under existing pond conditions and recommendation made.
Relationship of
primary production and fish production
From the above
discussion it would be obvious that fish production (FY) (secondary
production) in natural and tended waters should be related to primary
production (PG)
of water bodies concerned. As indicated already several attempts have
been made to correlate these FY with PG.
We also indicated
that the dissolved solids (nutrient load) measurable as conductivity
of the water concerned, have been well correlated with the production
of fish (fish yield). The Mospho-Edaphic Indix (MEI), referred to
above, (the productivity of the water bodies is directly correlated
with conductivity and inversely correlated with depth of the water
body), has been found to be correlating well with fish yield in
African lakes (Henderson and Wellcome, 1974; Melack, 1976). Melack
compared fish yields of 8 African lakes with corresponding PG and
obtained a relation:
Log. FY = 0.113 PG +
0.91; r = 0.57
where, FY = fish
yield in kg ha-1/yr-1
PG =
Gross photosynthesis in g O2 m-2 D-1
He found even a
better correlation between FY and PG for
a group of tropical lakes in Madras, India.
FY = 0.122 PG +
0.95; r = 0.82.
It would appear that
this relationship could be more obvious when production of lakes
stocked with herbivores fishes are considered, as in the case of
Madras lakes (Srinivasan, 1972).
(The MEI was poorly
correlated (r = 0.004) for African lakes, but the correlation was
better for the Madras lakes:
FY = 4.1 (k/z) 0.80;
r = 0.60,
where 'k' is
conductivity and 'z' is depth)
Fish yields in fish
ponds have also been correlated with primary productivity in manured
fish ponds in Israel by Noreiga-Curtis (1979). His observations are
presented below:

PG in
relation to depth in fish ponds. Values obtained by Ali (Aluu) are
given with reference to different times prior to and after
fertilisation. Hephers (1962) values for fertilized ponds at Israel
Measurement of productivity
Several methods are
used in measurement of productivity or rate of production.
Harvest method:
This is the simplest
and measuring the productivity of a water body such as fish pond by
harvest at the end of the season. The productivity given is secondary
productivity and indicates net productivity and also quite often fish
production given is in net weight giving productivity value.
Oxygen
measurement method
Primary productivity
can be measured from the amount of oxygen consumed by a volume of
water in a fixed period of time; water for which productivity is to
be determined is enclosed in sealed white and dark bottles (bottle
painted dark so light would not enter). Do (dissolved oxygen)
measurement of water is made at the beginning of the immersion
period. The two bottles are then immersed in the water body concerned
at the level from which the water is taken. The phytoplankton and
other elements in the water produce oxygen in the water bottle, but
some oxygen disappears due to respiration. The latter is measured
from the readings of dark bottle, where only respiration takes place.
Thus from the oxygen produced by photosynthesis of enclosed organism
(representing a sample of the water body) can be known. However this
oxygen production indicates net primary productivity only. From
the DO difference in dark bottle oxygen consumed by the enclosed
organisms can be obtained and when this respiration value is added to
the oxygen production in the white bottle, a value for gross
primary productivity is obtained.
Diel
method
Estimates of primary
productivity can also be made from diel changes in oxygen,
considering the day as the light bottle and night as the dark bottle.
The increase in DO in the day time is net primary production and the
decrease in the night is half the diel respiration. This can be added
on to the day-time gain to obtain daily gross photosynthesis. This
volume should normally be corrected for the loss or gain in oxygen
due to concentration gradient over the day.
C14 method
The most accurate
method for determining productivity is the method of using
radioactive carbon (C14) added as carbonate. Labelled
carbonate is added into a bottle containing water with the
phytoplankton and other organisms and after a short period of time
the plankton is separated, dried and planchetted and the radioactive
carbon fixed can be measured from the radioactive counts made. The
productivity measured thus is net primary productivity as the carbon
fixed in the tissues only are measured here.
In selecting a water
body for aquaculture measurement of primary productivity and
estimation of potential yield would be of great assistance in
planning the culture activity. This would be specially done while
evaluating water bodies (natural or man-made) for stocking(in
extensive culture) and also for cage and enclosure culture.
References
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14179924/13-Structure-and-Function-of-Ecosystem
www.fao.org/docrep/field/003/AC176E/AC176E05.htm
biological-productivity
www.fao.org/docrep/field/003/AC176E/AC176E08.htm
http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange1/current/lectures/kling/ecosystem/ecosystem.html
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecosystem
Seafood — Fish — Crustacea
Contact
| Terms of Use
| Article Submission Terms
| Advertising
| Fish Supplier Registration
| Equipment Supplier Registration
© 2012 Ascot International All Rights Reserved | Powered by Successful
Hosting
|